August 6th, 2012

mini me + poo

This is how to wake me up

The radio comes on at 6:55am. I slept through it.

But according to the 7:30am news bulletin on the Today programme, the Curiosity rover was 'slowed by a parachute until retro rockets fired up...' (to enable it to land softly).

'Whaaaat?!' went my sleepy brain. 'This is what happens when you let arts graduates write the news...'

It has taken about 30 minutes to consider that they probably meant (and should have said) '.. until retro rockets were fired' or similar.

My brain is still baffled by the scoring in the Olympics volleyball though. It's a great pity that coverage of volleyball is so poor outside the Olympics, because not only is it more exciting to watch than most (I'm afraid I include basketball in this) but it's also playable by more people. I actually enjoyed it at school (and not just for the teachers' endless cries of 'Don't kick the volleyball!!' - they really were good to kick...)

Since then, how you score in matches has changed (both sides can now score points for every rally, not just the side 'on serve') but WTF is the scoring for match results?

Currently in Group A, Poland have played four, won three, lost one, and have nine points. Bulgaria have also played four, won three, lost one, and have nine points.

OK, it's three points for a win and none for a loss, but why three for a win, given there aren't any draws? But...

Italy played four, won three, lost one... eight points. Huh?

Argentina played four, won two, lost two, six points. Australia, played four, won one, lost three, four points. Great Britain (who clearly need but won't get proper funding) played four, won none, lost four, no points.

If anyone can find an explanation on the official page or elsewhere, please do let me know.

This entry was originally posted at http://lovingboth.dreamwidth.org/469608.html, because despite having a permanent account, I have had enough of LJ's current owners trying to be evil. Please comment there using OpenID - comment count unavailable have and if you have an LJ account, you can use it for your OpenID account. Or just join Dreamwidth! It only took a couple of minutes to copy all my entries here to there.
mini me + poo

Lazyweb: literary forensics

Are there any websites / Linux programs for helping determine if the same person wrote two different sets of message board posts?

I can find plagiarism checkers, but these tend to be looking for whether the texts have a common source, rather than a common author. (If I write two texts, one about soft fruit and one about deckchairs, they are liable to pass a plagiarism test, but should still have enough in common for someone to be able to say that the same person wrote both...)

This entry was originally posted at http://lovingboth.dreamwidth.org/469880.html, because despite having a permanent account, I have had enough of LJ's current owners trying to be evil. Please comment there using OpenID - comment count unavailable have and if you have an LJ account, you can use it for your OpenID account. Or just join Dreamwidth! It only took a couple of minutes to copy all my entries here to there.