Works on Debian, works on Ubuntu which is based on Debian (although there's also a graphical tool which hides this process from you), but doesn't really work on Linux Mint which is based on Ubuntu. I know this, even if I have never had a good answer as to why it doesn't work on Mint.
Does this stop me trying it though...?
The problem is that it usually almost nearly works and you can do the 'almost nearly' bits yourself. So this time, something in the list of packages got in a twist. Amongst the list of programs that got deleted pending upgraded versions that it wouldn't install because it couldn't get the real latest version of something they depended on was Thunderbird and Firefox.
As no-one's worked that one out, this afternoon, I gave up and did it the way I am supposed to do: save a list of installed programs, install a fresh copy of the new release, then use the list to install the programs that weren't installed by that (it's semi-automated, so it's not too hard).
But grrr, why doesn't it work properly?
At least it's much easier than upgrading a Windows system, thanks to the proper separation of programs and user data. And it didn't cost £££s either.
This entry was originally posted at http://lovingboth.dreamwidth.org/484708.html, because despite having a permanent account, I have had enough of LJ's current owners trying to be evil. Please comment there using OpenID - have and if you have an LJ account, you can use it for your OpenID account. Or just join Dreamwidth! It only took a couple of minutes to copy all my entries here to there.